These examples are from Hermann Karcher’s Tokyo Notes, mildly generalized. We have a sphere with two Enneper ends. This leaves plenty of freedom so that the ends can be rotated against each other:

By choosing the angle wisely, the surfaces become a little bit less not embedded, if this makes sense. The same works of course with higher order Enneper ends.

This twist shows that we here have a non-contractible moduli space of minimal surfaces, something that hasn’t been observed for embedded surfaces.

All the surfaces here still have horizontal lines as normal symmetry lines and come besides the twist parameter with a parameter that stretches the catenoidal neck between the Enneper ends.

Resources

Mathematica Notebook

PoVRay sources

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s